spk-logo-white-text-short2
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

5 Continuous Integration Best Practices to Consider

Written by SPK Blog Post
Published on July 8, 2014

This week we would like to have a look at some continuous integration best practices. The list presented here is not exhaustive, and was inspired by a larger post on the topic at:  http://www.thoughtworks.com/continuous-integration

Our purpose is to expand on some of the concepts presented by ThoughtWorks and explain why these are best practices for continuous integration as part of your software development lifecycle (SDLC). There are additional practices that can be considered, but for today, we limit ourselves to expanding on these five:

  1. Automate the build – Builds are typically automated on one (or both) of two ways. One way is to initiate a build at a specific time of day, usually in the evening after development work has completed for the day.The other (and more useful) method for immediate feedback is to initiate a build after each source code check-in is done to the code repository. The obvious benefit is that each change made by a developer is evaluated by the build, rather than waiting for a daily build event. This immediate evaluation provides feedback on the single change set, rather than having to determine which change caused a problem in some nightly build.
  2. Keep the build fast – This probably should go without saying, but often even the obvious should be said. If the build is fast, developers will depend on the build to give them quick feedback. If the build takes an hour or longer, developers will find ways to work around the system, or will not use it.
  3. Make your build self-testing – This is key! Assuming there are no compile errors, we want to have some kind of handle on the code quality. The trick here is to limit this quick, initial testing so that it does not conflict with the goal of speed. If too many unnecessary items are included in the initial test run, it may become too slow to be useful to the developers.
  4. Test in a clone of the production environment – Again, the obvious. If you really want to know the state of your code, keep a spare copy of the production environment around to test it against. And update that copy regularly!
  5. Automate deployment – For some of the same reasons you automate anything, to eliminate human errors and oversights! Push a button, or run a command, and the build results are deployed. But don’t forget to run a test of the deployment also!

Again, this list of continuous integration best practices is not intended to be the last word. But hopefully we have provided enough thoughts here to get you started on your own list! Check back and let us know what you thought.

Next Steps:

Latest White Papers

How to Prepare Your Organization for an AI Rollout

How to Prepare Your Organization for an AI Rollout

Managing your organization’s knowledge base may be challenging, especially if information is scattered across multiple systems. Discover how Atlassian’s AI Rovo agents help manage this.What You Will Learn In this eBook you will discover: Why knowledge management...

Related Resources

Reducing CAD File Errors and Rework

Reducing CAD File Errors and Rework

File mistakes and unnecessary rework remain all too common in the engineering space. Inefficient CAD file management due to poor collaboration and hardware limitations can result in missing details or time-consuming corrections. This is why reducing CAD errors is so...

Making the Leap from IBM Rational DOORS to Modern ALM Solutions

Making the Leap from IBM Rational DOORS to Modern ALM Solutions

For years, IBM Rational DOORS has been a cornerstone for requirements management in highly regulated industries. Unfortunately, as development practices evolve, DOORS has not evolved with them. One of the biggest challenges with this is that there’s no direct upgrade...

The Cost of Confusion: Streamlining Service Manuals

The Cost of Confusion: Streamlining Service Manuals

While service manuals may seem like just a reference guide, they should be considered part of the product itself.  When service documentation is outdated, inconsistent, or difficult to follow, it leads to costly errors, frustrated customers, and compliance risks. In...