spk-logo-white-text-short2
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Why Software Builds Fail and Areas for Improvement

Written by SPK Blog Post
Published on June 29, 2015

In a recently published paper, researchers at Google examined the issue of failed software builds within their organization. Specifically, they wanted to address the separate questions of “How often do builds fail?”, “Why do builds fail”, and “How long does it take to fix broken builds?” To answer these questions, the researchers looked at 26.6 million Java and C++ builds due to the overwhelming usage of these two languages within Google. For the purposes of this article, we will review the results of the question “why do builds fail?”

To determine why builds were failing, the researchers examined the build logs and categorized compiler error messages into different groups. Of the categories defined, the researchers looked at the top 25 most frequent error messages to identify the most common cause of build failure. The results indicated that only 10 percent of the error categories accounted for 90 percent of the broken builds, regardless of the language. Additionally, those errors where most commonly dependency related.

Insofar as these findings are generalizable to organizations outside of Google, the implications of this research suggest that dependency management is one of the most critical areas of concern for decreasing the amount of broken software builds. Potential actions could include reducing the dependencies for a given project, or developing assistive tools to help developers resolve dependency errors. Ideally, the goal should be to help prevent developers from submitting changes that contain dependency errors. In this study, the average resolution time was one to two additional builds. In this scenario, if we assume introducing a dependency-related bug requires two additional builds, the cost of such a bug is 3 times the elapsed build time in addition to the developer’s time required to resolve it.

Next Steps:

David Hubbell
Software Engineer
SPK and Associates

Latest White Papers

Replacing DOORS with Next Generation ALM

Replacing DOORS with Next Generation ALM

IBM DOORS has remained a consistent tool for managing software requirements. However, it has not kept up with the modern landscape. Explore options such as DOORS NG and other next-generation ALM tools in this eBook.What You Will Learn In this eBook, you will discover:...

Related Resources

Unlocking Developer Productivity with Atlassian Compass

Unlocking Developer Productivity with Atlassian Compass

When companies develop software, speed and scalability are everything.  Yet, as organizations grow, complexity creeps in. Microservices multiply, ownership becomes unclear, and development slows.  Atlassian Compass is changing that.  Designed to bring visibility,...

Top Test Management Tools Every Software Team Should Know

Top Test Management Tools Every Software Team Should Know

Modern software teams may be faster than ever, but they can only release with confidence if they have strong testing practices in place. As distributed teams, hybrid QA models, and rapid DevOps cycles increase, test management tools have become the backbone of...

Accelerating Innovation in Automotive with Codebeamer and Jira

Accelerating Innovation in Automotive with Codebeamer and Jira

You will be taken to another page to registerBy submitting this form, I acknowledge receipt of SPK and Associates' Privacy Policy.The automotive industry is evolving faster than ever, driven by software-defined vehicles, complex regulatory requirements, and the...