spk-logo-white-text-short2
0%
1-888-310-4540 (main) / 1-888-707-6150 (support) info@spkaa.com
Select Page

Why Software Builds Fail and Areas for Improvement

Written by SPK Blog Post
Published on June 29, 2015

In a recently published paper, researchers at Google examined the issue of failed software builds within their organization. Specifically, they wanted to address the separate questions of “How often do builds fail?”, “Why do builds fail”, and “How long does it take to fix broken builds?” To answer these questions, the researchers looked at 26.6 million Java and C++ builds due to the overwhelming usage of these two languages within Google. For the purposes of this article, we will review the results of the question “why do builds fail?”

To determine why builds were failing, the researchers examined the build logs and categorized compiler error messages into different groups. Of the categories defined, the researchers looked at the top 25 most frequent error messages to identify the most common cause of build failure. The results indicated that only 10 percent of the error categories accounted for 90 percent of the broken builds, regardless of the language. Additionally, those errors where most commonly dependency related.

Insofar as these findings are generalizable to organizations outside of Google, the implications of this research suggest that dependency management is one of the most critical areas of concern for decreasing the amount of broken software builds. Potential actions could include reducing the dependencies for a given project, or developing assistive tools to help developers resolve dependency errors. Ideally, the goal should be to help prevent developers from submitting changes that contain dependency errors. In this study, the average resolution time was one to two additional builds. In this scenario, if we assume introducing a dependency-related bug requires two additional builds, the cost of such a bug is 3 times the elapsed build time in addition to the developer’s time required to resolve it.

Next Steps:

David Hubbell
Software Engineer
SPK and Associates

Latest White Papers

A Field Guide to Threat Vectors in the Software Supply Chain

A Field Guide to Threat Vectors in the Software Supply Chain

As a software developer, your main priority should be quickly and efficiently delivering software. The last thing you want is to worry about security threats. In this eBook, we will educate you on threat vectors and how GitLab can help secure your software supply...

Related Resources

An Executive’s Guide to Strengthening Software Supply Chain Security

An Executive’s Guide to Strengthening Software Supply Chain Security

Modern software is assembled from a complex web of components, contributors, and tools, both internal and external. While this modularity accelerates development, it also expands the attack surface. For executives, a single breach in the software supply chain can...

Accelerating Product Development with AI-Powered GitLab Duo

Accelerating Product Development with AI-Powered GitLab Duo

Getting products designed and manufactured quickly is necessary to stay afloat in a competitive market. When working with software-driven products, this timeline can be stricter. Whether you're launching a new application or updating features for a legacy product,...

Protected Container Repositories and more in the latest GitLab releases

Protected Container Repositories and more in the latest GitLab releases

GitLab has officially released version 17.8. This update offers significant enhancements across security, DevOps workflows, and machine learning capabilities. With over 60 improvements, this release further solidifies GitLab's role as the most comprehensive AI-powered...